May/June 2005 Volume 1, Issue 1
©2005 Tsunami Fishing Systems
 

View From the Helm


E-TEC Buzz |  Fishing Stuff |  2-Stroke or 4-Stroke? |  Fuelish Thoughts |  Remembering a Catch

Let's face it - offshore fishing usually requires burning a lot of gas or diesel. Larger boats often get no more than 1 - 2 miles per gallon, which means 100+ gallons of gas per trip. Ocean skiffs are better because of their smaller size, at 4 - 6 miles per gallon (with a 4-stroke or DFI motor), but still chew up quite a bit of gas. That translates into quite a bit of cash on every trip.

Also, while I'm not a rabid environmentalist, I think it's clear that burning fossil fuels contributes to a number of our environmental problems. Whether it's acid rain (NOX emissions), global warning (carbon dioxide), or groundwater contamination (MTBE fuel additive), burning gasoline contributes to pollution at some level. So better fuel economy means not only less cost, but also a cleaner environment.

In the 90 HP shootout article mentioned in "The E-TEC Buzz", the test boat with the best mileage got just around 9 MPG . The test boat was an extremely light, minimally loaded aluminum skiff. A little later, I saw an article in Boating magazine that talked about a boat that achieved over 100 MPG . That boat was essentially a high-tech rowing shell with a small motor running at 1-2 mph, but it got me thinking - could we reach double-digit fuel economy at cruising speeds in an ocean skiff?

Seems to me that in theory, a light power catamaran or trimaran around 18 - 20' LOA, with one or two small DFI 2-stroke or 4-stroke motors could achieve over 10 MPG with a cruise speed around 15 - 20 mph. What do you think?  I'd like to hear your opinion on the topic... . Could such a hull be made strong enough to survive regular offshore use?

Another, less obvious, way that boats contribute to air pollution is through the fumes from resins and solvents used in manufacturing fiberglass or composite boat hulls. In recent years, some of the larger boat manufacturers have have gotten emissions under control by using closed-system molds (like Genmar's VEC technology, or Sea Ray's RIMFIRE Technology ), or vacuum bagging techniques. The Triumph Boat Company's roto-molded ropelene hull is another low-impact construction technique. Interestingly enough, vacuum bagging of composites did not start out as an emissions control technique. Rather, vacuum bagging was used to get a more thorough saturation of resin in the hull material, resulting in a stronger hull. The emissions control was just a side benefit. All of these construction techniques are the most effective on smaller hulls, which makes them a good fit for the kinds of boats OSJ readers use.

 
<< Previous Page Next Page >>